03 May 2022 – Minutes
THAME TOWN COUNCIL
Minutes of a Meeting of the Planning & Environment Committee held on 3 May 2022 at 6:30pm in the Upper Chamber, Thame Town Hall.
Present:
Cllrs B Austin, P Cowell (Town Mayor), A Dite (Deputy Chairman), D Dodds, L Emery, H Fickling (Chairman), H Richards, A Midwinter and T Wyse
Officers
G Markland, Neighbourhood Plan Continuity Officer
L Fuller, Committee Services Officer
1 Apologies for Absence
Apologies were received from Cllr Deacock (personal) and Champken-Woods (county council business).
2 Declarations of Interest and Dispensations
There were no declarations of interest.
3 Public Participation and Public Questions
There was no public participation.
There were no public questions put to the Committee.
4 Minutes
The Minutes of the Committee Meeting held on 5 April 2022 were confirmed as a correct record, and were signed by the Chairman.
5 Planning Applications
1557 – 9 YOUENS DRIVE – AMENDMENT NO.1
Single storey rear and, garage conversion and porch extension. (as amended by plans received 05 April 2022 showing removal of side extension and creating a new garage in the existing car port area).
SUPPORTS and has a RESPONSE:
-
-
- Subject to no objection from the County Highways Officer.
- Subject to a condition that prevents the garage from being converted into living space.
-
Neighbourhood Plan Policies: H6, GA6, ESDQ16, ESDQ28, ESDQ29
SODC Local Plan Policies: DES1, DES5, DES6, DES7, DES8, H20, TRANS5
1573 – 16A EAST STREET
Formation of Gazebo
P22/S1223/HH
SUPPORTS and has a RESPONSE:
-
-
- Subject to no objection from the District’s Forestry Officer
-
Neighbourhood Plan Policies: H6, ESDQ16, ESDQ20, ESDQ28
SODC Local Plan Policies: DES1, DES2, DES5, DES6, DES7, DES8, ENV1, ENV6, ENV8
1575 – 8 BANNISTER ROAD
Proposed garage conversion.
P22/S1354/HH
SUPPORTS and has a RESPONSE:
-
-
- The committee regret the loss of the garage for its original purpose.
-
Neighbourhood Plan Policies: H6, GA6, ESDQ16, ESDQ29
SODC Local Plan Policies: DES1, DES6, DES7, DES8, TRANS5
1576 – 56 TOWERSEY DRIVE
Demolition of existing conservatory and construction of new single storey rear extension.
P22/S1347/HH
SUPPORTS and has a RESPONSE:
-
-
- Subject to compliance with the 45-degree rule.
-
Neighbourhood Plan Policies: H6, ESDQ16
SODC Local Plan Policies: DES1, DES5, DES6, DES7, DES8, H20
1577 – 12 CHESHIRE ROAD
Proposed single storey rear and single storey front extensions.
P22/S1305/HH
SUPPORTS
Neighbourhood Plan Policies: H6, ESDQ16, ESDQ28
SODC Local Plan Policies: DES1, DES5, DES6, DES7, DES8, H20
1578 – 22 PICKENFIELD
Single storey rear extension and front porch.
P22/S1454/HH
SUPPORTS
Neighbourhood Plan Policies: H6, ESDQ16, ESDQ28
SODC Local Plan Policies: DES1, DES5, DES6, DES7, DES8, H20
6 Consultation – Proposed Disabled Persons Parking Places (DPPP)
Oxfordshire County Council are consulting on the introduction of two DPPPs in Thame, on Church Road (Southeast side; opposite No.1) and Park Street (Northeast side; outside Nos.33 & 34).
It was noted that there were parking pressures on Park Street, however it was recognised that the priority must be given to disabled persons.
RESOLVED that:
- The Town Council supports the introduction of a new DPPP bay on both Church Road and Park Street.
7 Development off Elms Road by Rectory Homes
Following the Town Council’s recommendation for the street name on this development to be named as ‘May’s Field’, the District Council contacted the developer who have asked whether ‘May’s Crescent’ would be supported by the Town Council.
Members felt that May’s Field remains an appropriate street name given the site’s history. The field belonged to May’s House during the 19th Century.
RESOLVED that:
- The Town Council upholds its suggestion to put forward May’s Field as the street name, as it is appropriate to the site’s history.
8 Contrary Decisions 2021-22
Members noted the planning decisions issued between 19 May 2021 and 26 April 2022 which were contrary to the Town Council’s recommendation.
The Committee Services Officer advised that this document was produced for internal records however it was felt it may be useful for Members to receive it at the end of each committee year. The document shows any decision issued by the District Council that was contrary to the Town Council’s recommendation, and also whether the application was called-in to the District’s Planning Committee. Most applications were contrary as the Town Council objected but the District Council granted permission under delegated powers.
9 For Information
The items for information were noted.
With regards to Item 9a, it was noted that the premises licence application photographs did not include the large a-board that is placed on the footway. It is frustrating that no licence or permission is required to place an A-board, when other street furniture or signage requires this. It was noted that the Town Council has a policy to monitor A-boards however there was some uncertainty as to whether enforcement was a matter for the District Council or County Council. It was suggested that the matter therefore be reported to Fix My Street.
The meeting concluded at 6:54pm.
Signed ……………………..
Chairman, 24 May 2022